Dec 29, 2009

COP-15 Wrap Up

Most of you know that I have recently returned from the COP-15 UNFCCC Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, Denmark. I had a blog dedicated to this, but wanted to post my wrap up here as well. The full text appears below.

--

It has been over a week since we've last written. We've been stuck in airports in Amsterdam and London and arrived home in time for the holidays to finally wind down. We wanted to write a final entry in this blog to summarize our experience in Copenhagen with our thoughts and a look forward to the future.

The first questions everyone has asked us since we have arrived back home is: 'Aren't you disappointed with the outcome?' and the answer is yes, we absolutely are. Others ask if we think it was a waste of time, and our answer to that is absolutely not. Despite holding out some hint of optimism throughout the conference, we knew pretty much before it even began that we would likely not get the deal we were hoping for. In the days leading up to Mr. Obama's arrival it began to look like we would get absolutely nothing (and some will argue that is exactly what we got).

Here is why COP-15 was not a waste of time:

1. China and India brought their involvement to the next level. Sure they did not sign anything legally binding and thus have no legal obligation to do anything, but in talking with Mr. Obama and eventually getting something signed (even if symbolic) they showed they are ready to come to the table. We now have one year to turn this symbol into something substantial.

2. A further consensus was reached on the role of developing nations in combatting climate change. While it may not appear so to those watching from the outside, the world moved much closer to a consensus of its international obligations to the global south. The developed world caused the climate change crisis and thus must bear the heaviest burden in reversing it. The developing world was also seen for what it is - an opportunity to combat climate change through strategic programs such as REDD and involvement in carbon markets.

3. The international attention for the climate change issue was unprecedented, and actually surprisingly positive. There are still deniers out there in full force, but leading up to the conference with 'Climate Gate' being twisted and distorted to the extent it was it seemed that misinformation was winning the battle on climate change. But the world paused and watched and listened as world leaders gathered in Copenhagen. The issue is gaining international attention like never before.

4. Education - The truth be told, a conference like this could almost never be a total waste of time. The best and most brilliant scientific and political minds were in one place and ideas were being shared and discussions being held. Almost everyone at the conference likely left with a great deal more information than they had when they arrived - and knowledge and education will be extremely powerful tools in what is going to be one of the biggest battles humanity has faced.

On a personal level we achieved all our personal goals - we let everyone we met know that a large majority of Canadians feel differently than their government on the issue of climate change. We learned a ton that we will be bringing back to our politicians and environmental organizations in the area. We met and networked with people from around the globe who will be pushing for similar initiatives in their own countries.

We have many thanks due for this wonderful experience. To the International Federation of Liberal Youth - we of course could not have attended this conference with out you. Thank you for your hard work in gaining observer status at the conference and for your guidance leading up to the conference. To the Young Liberals of Canada who brought together such a strong network of Canadian youth at this conference and to those in our delegation who worked around the clock to sort through the UN chaos and make this event as big a success as possible.

To our sponsors and supporters at Praxis Public Relations, the Mississauga-Brampton South Federal Liberal Association, MP Navdeep Bains, the Oakville Beaver, and the Milton Canadian Champion. Many thanks!

To all those who care about this issue, don't lose hope. It seems like we are always saying 'Maybe next year' - but we are getting closer. Eyes must turn not just to COP-16 in Mexico but to the build up to it. US climate legislation will be a first big step, as well as watching what China and India do over the next year. We can only hope that the Government of Canada will step it up and not leave all the work to the likes of Ontario, Quebec, and B.C. who have already made commitments. Keep pushing your government to act - there is clearly a limited amount of time to act on this issue and the clock is ticking.

Dec 28, 2009

My favorite 25 movies of the decade

As promised, my favorite 25 movies of the decade:

25. The Diving Bell & The Butterfly (Julian Schnabel)
24. Pan's Labyrinth (Guillermo Del Toro)
23. The Departed (Martin Scorsese)
22. Volver (Pedro Almodovar)
21. A History of Violence (David Cronenberg)
20. Lars & The Real Girl (Craig Gillespie)
19. The Constant Gardener (Fernando Meirelles)
18. Juno (Jason Reitman)
17. Garden State (Zach Braff)
16. Little Children (Todd Field)
15. Up in the Air (Jason Reitman)
14. Brokeback Mountain (Ang Lee)
13. The Wrestler (Darren Aronofsky)
12. Slumdog Millionaire (Danny Boyle)
11. Adaptation (Spike Jonze)
10. There Will Be Blood (Paul Thomas Anderson)
9. The Dark Knight (Christopher Nolan)
8. The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (Peter Jackson)
7. Vicki Cristina Barcelona (Woody Allen)
6. The Squid & The Whale (Noah Baumbach)
5. Match Point (Woody Allen)
4. Punch Drunk Love (Paul Thomas Anderson)
3. Ghost World (Terry Zwigoff)
2. Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (Michel Gondry)
1. Lost in Translation (Sofia Coppola)

The Decade in Lists

I'm back from Copenhagen and fresh from the holidays. Check out my experiences at COP-15 at my specific blog here.

In the meantime, since this blog is starved for content - i'm going to post my decade end lists. I'll start with music and then follow it with film in the next post. Enjoy!

Top Albums of the Decade:

100. The Velvet Teen - Elysium
99. The Dirty Projectors - Bitte Orca
98. Sonic Youth - Sonic Nurse
97. The Mountain Goats - Get Lonely
96. Of Montreal - Satanic Panic in the Attic
95. Radiohead - Hail to the Thief
94. Animal Collective - Feels
93. ...And You Will Know Us By the Trail of Dead - Worlds Apart
92. Architecture in Helsinki - Places Like These
91. MIA - Kala
90. The Shins - Wincing the Night Away
89. Bon Iver - For Emma, Forever Ago
88. Iron & Wine/Calexico - In the Reins
87. Yo La Tengo - Summer Sun
86. Vampire Weekend - Vampire Weekend
85. Junior Boys - So This is Goodbye
84. Passion Pit - Manners
83. TV on the Radio - Return to Cookie Mountain
82. Of Montreal - The Sunlandic Twins
81. Mirah - You Think Its Like This, But Really Its Like This
80. Jens Lekman - Oh You're So Silent Jens
79. The Streets - A Grand Don't Come for Free
78. Spiritualized - Let it Come Down
77. Feist - The Reminder
76. Okkervil River - The Stand Ins

75. Yeah Yeah Yeahs - Its Blitz
74. Patrick Wolf - The Magic Position
73. The Shins - Oh, Inverted World
72. The Rapture - Echoes
71. The Notwist - Neon Golden
70. Of Montreal - Skeletal Lamping
69. Death Cab for Cutie - Transatlanticism
68. Spoon - Gimme Fiction
67. Bright Eyes - LIFTED
66. Yeah Yeah Yeahs - Show Your Bones
65. The New Poronographers - Mass Romantic
64. Girl Talk - Night Ripper
63. Sunset Rubdown - Shut Up I Am Dreaming
62. Stars - Heart
61. Frightened Rabbit - The Midnight Organ Flight
60. Deerhunter - Microcastle
59. Animal Collective - Merriweather Post Pavillion
58. Cold War Kids - Robbers & Cowards
57. Guillemots - Through the Windowpane
56. Okkervil River - Down the River of Golden Dreams
55. LCD Soundsystem - Sound of Silver
54. Broken Social Scene - Broken Social Scene
53. Bright Eyes - Fevers & Mirrors
52. The Hold Steady - Almost Killed Me
51. Japandroids - Post Nothing

50. The Thermals - The Body, The Blood, The Machine
49. Ryan Adams - Gold
48. ...And You Will Know Us By the Trail of Dead - Source Tags & Codes
47. Okkervil River - Don't Fall In Love With Everyone You See
46. Bloc Party - Silent Alarm
45. Patrick Wolf - The Bachelor
44. Godspeed You! Black Emperor - Lift Yr Skinny Fists Like Antennas to Heaven
43. The Blood Brothers - Burn Piano Island, Burn
42. Kanye West - Graduation
41. Yo La Tengo - ...And Then Nothing Turned Itself Inside Out
40. The Hold Steady - Separation Sunday
39. The Decemberists - Castaways and Cutouts
38. Architecture in Helsinki - In Case We Die
37. Andrew Bird - Armchair Apocrypha
36. Grizzly Bear - Veckatimest
35. The Mountain Goats - Tallahassee
34. The Hold Steady - Stay Positive
33. The Flaming Lips - Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots
32. Of Montreal - Hissing Fauna, Are You The Destroyer?
31. Tv on the Radio - Dear Science
30. Cut Copy - In Ghost Colours
29. The Knife - Silent Shout
28. The New Pornographers - Twin Cinema
27. Modest Mouse - The Moon & Antarctica
26. Stars - Set Yourself on FIre

25. The Shins - Chutes Too Narrow
24. Radiohead - Amnesiac
23. Joanna Newsom - Ys
22. Clap Your Hands Say Yeah - Clap Your Hands Say Yeah
21. Wolf Parade - Apologies to the Queen Mary
20. Sufjan Stevens - Illinois
19. The Decemberists - Picaresque
18. Eels - Daises of the Galaxy
17. The Microphones - The Glow, Pt II
16. The Blood Brothers - Crimes
15. Okkervil River - the Stage Names
14. Andrew Bird - Andrew Bird & The Mysterious Production of Eggs
13. Sun Kil Moon - Ghosts of the Great Highway
12. Interpol - Turn on the Bright Lights
11. Radiohead - In Rainbows
10. The National - Boxer
09. Bright Eyes - I'm Wide Awake, It's Morning
08. The Decemberists - The Crane Wife
07. Okkervil River - Black Sheep Boy
06. The Hold Steady - Boys & Girls in America
05. Wilco - Yankee Hotel Foxtrot
04. Broken Social Scene - You Forgot It In People
03. Arcade Fire - Funeral
02. The National - Alligator
01. Radiohead - Kid A

Nov 29, 2009

Film Review: The Road

Film Review: The Road
2009
Directed By: John Hillcoat
Rating: **/*****

I have to admit I have never read a novel by critically acclaimed author Cormac McCarthy - but after seeing the last two films based on his novels i'm not sure I want to (No Country for Old Men being the other one). Both films, while entirely different were both completely empty. The Road shows some promise at the beginning, but ultimately just drags on without much purpose or plot. The end of the world has been so overdone there is very little left to explore, and this movie does nothing but tread over ground that has already been visited countless times.

How many more times can the nature of human beings in dire situations be examined? The Lord of the Flies philosophy has been beaten to death. Without much interest in this motif there was very little left to examine. Like No Country there are long stretches of little happening between the moments of entertainment. There is absolutely no hope for a happy ending, so one just finds themselves wondering when they are going to end this thing. And then when they do end it, its an absolutely ridiculous ending with no explanation. The viewer receives a brief moment of interest from playing back the movie in their head looking for signs about the ending but this scan back cannot bring anymore meaning or sense to the way this one finishes.

The lone bright spot that keeps this one from sinking to quite the depths of No Country was the acting. Both Viggo and Charlize in her minor role do quite a lot with what they are given to work with. Viggo is in nearly every scene from beginning to end and is given very little wortwhile dialogue to work with but makes the most of it. Charlize, as always, is solid in her role - making her few short moments on the screen one of the few things that last with you after the movie has finished.

As for movies to see this year, this is definitely skipable. I'll stop short of cautioning people to stay away but it is quite overhyped.

Oct 31, 2009

Film Review: An Education


Film Review: An Education
2009
Directed By: Lorne Sherfig
Rating: ****.5/*****

I should probably wait to review this film until I have seen it a second time, as there is a great deal I am still not sure about. There were a couple details I didn't like, and i'm not sure the ending was as satisfying as the rest of the film. Still, it was one of those films that had a certain feel to it - that felt like it was teaching something greater than what is immediately evident on the surface. It has been difficult to get it out of my head. So i'm going with my gut and saying that this films flaws are not significant enough to stop it from being a minor classic.

I had heard great things about Carey Mulligan's performance going in to the screening, but it really is something else. There is a reason she is the early favourite for Best Actress and she would certainly deserve that award. The film is brilliantly acted as a whole with Peter Sarsgaard turning in one of the top performances of his career and all the supporting cast doing their part as well.

In one of the early scenes, Sarsgaard's character announces that he got his education in the school of life - a clear foreshadowing of the premise the film will base itself around. Mulligan goes from school girl to adult in seemingly no time at all and receives a life lesson unlike anything that could have been taught to her in school. Its heart-breaking to witness her making all the wrong decisions, but one questions whether they would have done anything differently if the 'dream' was sprung upon us with few consequences.

I'd be curious on others thoughts on the film, particularly the few things that I am still hesitant about. Did the film wrap up too quickly? I won't give anything away, but i'd be curious if others felt that Sarsgaard's motivations were not examined in full after what seemed like some heavy build up. The ending almost felt abrupt - and it was one of those films that I felt wouldn't have suffered from an extended length.

Regardless, this is in contention for film of the year both in my personal books and it should make a splash on the awards circuit. Especially with 10 films being nominated for Best Picture this should be a lock for a nomination, and as mentioned - Mulligan will compete for the top acting prize.

Oct 25, 2009

CanWest says infrastructure spending all equal...

Today, CanWest did exactly what everyone expected them to do - they found a way to 'prove' that the accusations by the Liberal Party (& independent analysis by the Globe & Mail) were not accurate. There is nothing irregular going on here. The following is the front page of the National Post website right now:


Forgetting the ridiculous headline story that a poll outside of an election showed a worse result of what happened after an ugly campaign, it is the story on the right that deserves the attention. So Canwest is declaring that Non-Tory ridings AREN'T in fact getting disproportionate funding. To make such a bold statement, they must have done a full analysis of each and every stimulus fund right? After all - the only thing the Globe and Mail did was suggest that the RINC fund went to predominantly Tory ridings (as witnessed in their headline: "Stimulus program favours Tory ridings).

But no, all that has been done is another singular analysis of one program - yet somehow this warrants a broad conclusion. What is most bizarre is how little substance is even behind this one analysis. David Akin seems like a good guy, so I certainly won't suggest he chose this program and this way of demonstrating the data to intentionally benefit the Conservatives image - but it certainly worked out that way.

The program being analyzed is the Knowledge Infrastructure program which gives money to Colleges and Universities. The study concludes that 38% of the funding from this program goes to Tory ridings - less than the percentage of seats belonging to the Tories. Thus, nothing irregular here - in fact the NDP ridings actually got FAR more stimulus money than their seat totals dictate they should get. Case closed right?

Wrong. It may seem like this for a brief instant, but as soon as one uses analytical thinking one can see why this does not add up. Colleges and Universities require large enough populations to support them and thus the vast majority of them are in major urban centres. Where are most of the NDP and Liberal ridings? Major urban centres. In addition, youth are obviously the biggest population of those that attend Universities. Youth also are most likely to vote NDP and Liberal - so by logic alone, University and College towns are most likely to be NDP and Liberal ridings. In other words - if the Tories actually had their "fair share" of stimulus from this program in their ridings, it would be an enormous sign of trouble.

What David Akin and CanWest need to do is demonstrate how the distribution of funds from this program compares to the percentage of institutions in the ridings of each party. I would be shocked if 38% of institutions fall within Conservative ridings - and thus this may actually strengthen the argument that Tory ridings get more than they deserve. Even if there is actually 38% of institutions in Tory ridings, there is even more complication from the populations of Universities. Logic suggests that a contribution of x dollars would be a lot more beneficial for Algonquin College than the University of Toronto - a fair distribution would also consider population of schools.

To sum it up - this is a complex fund to analyze. David Akin noted in his follow up blog that the Globe and Mail didn't look at the proportion of rinks and bridges, etc. in different ridings. It's true - but not really a fair point. Any person using logic knows that rinks and recreation facilities are pretty common in communities across Ontario, whereas educational facilities are more concentrated in certain types of areas. I challenge the National Post and CanWest to validate their findings. If they are truly an unbiased outlet, they shouldn't be afraid to look at the facts.

The Globe and Mail article did not prove that Tory slush funds existed in all infrastructure programs by any means, but they did add proof to long time Liberal claims that these funds are not being distributed equally - something this CanWest article does absolutely nothing to disprove.

Oct 21, 2009

Film Review: The Damned United


the-damned-united-339870140.jpg image by boro_01
Film Review: The Damned United
2009
Directed By: Tom Hooper
Rating: ***/*****

Peter Morgan is one of those rare screenwriters that often draws more attention to himself than the director of his films - along the lines of a Charlie Kaufmann. Rightfully so, as most of his films feel as if they truly belong to him, even with a talented series of directors charged with the task of bringing his screenplays to life. Morgan was perhaps the main reason I wanted to see this movie - I have very little interest in the sport of soccer and less interest in the history of it. However I didn't have much interest in Queen Elizabeth or David Frost either and thoroughly enjoyed what Morgan did with them. Plus, he was once again reunited with the extremely talented Michael Sheen.

Neither Sheen nor Morgan disappoint - the film is a fascinating telling of yet another true story. It does not quite live up to the heights of Frost/Nixon but still holds Morgan's place as one of the best adaptors of reality around today. Sheen really steals the show here - Clough is such a character and Sheen plays him brilliantly. He oozes arrogance but manages to stay likeable and evoke sympathy as it all begins to crumble for him. He is the classic flawed but loveable character and he captures it quite well.

I do have to say that the ending of this film left me a bit unsatisfied - there seemed to be much more of the story to be told that would have made for great entertainment and a more satisfying conclusion. However I understand why Morgan decided to finish the film where he did - like in all true stories there needs ending and Morgan's purpose was to focus on a rivalry. The film ends when the rivalry does.

If films that will teach you something along the way but won't sacrifice drama and entertainment, Morgan's films are for you and The Damned United is a worthy addition to his resume.

Oct 4, 2009

Film Review: Zombieland


Film Review: Zombieland
2009
Directed By: Ruben Fleischer
Rating: 3.5/5

It feels weird to be even discussing this movie as a serious piece of cinema, until one remembers that the goal of cinema is to entertain. While watching this movie I was brought back to the cult phenomenon of Snakes on a Plane a few summers back. My friends were part of the bandwagon of hype leading up to the film's release - so there we were opening night with snakes on a plane tattoos ready to yell and cheer at all the ridiculousness of the film. And it absolutely sucked. It had about two laughs in the whole movie and actually made a hyped up crowd expecting a movie so bad it would be good to leave disappointed.

I bring this up because Zombieland has exactly the opposite effect. Many people went in expecting a horror movie. Even those who knew what it would be like didn't know what they were in for. The laughs and applause expected at Snakes on a Plane came naturally in this film. And the writers and directors knew that with a topic like Zombies one was better not to take themselves seriously.

As a result the film clicked on every level - the action sequences were intense (who doesn't love some Zombie killing?) and the humor was fresh. Bill Murray's little cameo alone is worth the price of admission for Murray fans. The seemingly unnatural pairing of horror and comedy is still underused despite working well for several decades now. The acting certainly didn't command a lot from a talented cast but all four of the stars did quite well. Eisenberg has become one of my favorite young actors with this being an excellent addition to his resume already including Squid and the Whale and (underrated) Adventureland.

Bottom line: see this movie when you're in the mood for some mindless fun - jumps, laughs, surprises and the whole lot.

It Lives!



Many of us have philosophized about what it will (could) be like when artificial intelligence technology allows machines and robots to actually think and feel. The political community of Canada got a glimpse of the answer to this question when our very own Prime Minister who (despite attempts with the sweater vest series) for the better part of the decade has acted as nothing but a machine for the far right agenda actually showed a moment of humanness. That's right: Stephan Harper took to the stage and played a little piano and sang a few tunes.

Sure, it was well thought out and planned but one really can't judge a politician for this as every aspect of one's life must be thought about in terms of pros and cons for one's image. For the first time ever the guy looked like he was taking delight in something other than the destruction of the Liberal party. I think the moment was as genuine as we've seen from Harper and while it ultimately changes nothing in terms of his poor policy and dangerous vision for this country - it is something I wouldn't mind seeing more of. You like to think there is some good in everyone, including your 'enemies' and Harper was one of the first i've seen that just didn't seem to have an ounce of good in him.

Times like these are disastrous for the Liberal party and the opposition in general as Harper has somehow managed to maintain the support of over a 1/3 of the country despite acting like a a Con-bot. These moments are insignificant in the bigger picture but can actually have an impact on the voters who draw their opinions on politicians from a small pool of events. If 'A little help from my friends" is conjured up in our heads when we think of Mr.Harper instead of the man whose government left an innocent woman to rot for 3 months in Kenya - we could be in for a tough election.

The Liberals need to find a way to improve Ignatieff's image in a similar way and do so in a way that comes off as genuine and not a simple photo opp.

Sep 17, 2009

Film Review: Extract


Film Review: Extract
2009
Directed By: Mike Judge
Rating: ***/*****

Office Space has been a long time favourite of mine, and has been sort of the black sheep in my collection. What I mean by that is that I am most often a fan of movie with complex characters and engaging plot. Office Space was a film that succeeded not on either of these premises, but on the sheer perfection of the office satire. When I first saw it I was still a student but even then I could relate to the characters in the movie through my various part time jobs.

Extract is actually a break away from the select few pieces of Judge's work that I have seen in that it attempts to go a little more in depth with some of his characters, which I admire it for. Extract is closer to a movie I would typically enjoy than Office Space was. Yet, I still didn't find myself falling for it quite as much for the simple fact that it seemed to lack purpose. I don't know what Judge was aiming to show us with this film. He certainly does a great job finding those characters that reflect those who irritate us most in life, but here the film plays out like a series of character sketches.

Don't get me wrong - there IS a plot, but it kind of gets lost in the movie and is not the most memorable part. Still, I can't say I dislike Extract either because I went into the theatre with high hopes and I still laughed my ass off and came out of the movie satisfied. This won't end up among my favourites of all time, but its still worth a viewing.